← All claims

Supplements · Sweeteners · Metabolic & Cardiometabolic

non-nutritive sweeteners increases cardiovascular disease

Leans support Supplements 🔬 Includes disconfirming

Part of: • non-nutritive sweeteners

RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.32

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: All trials, pooled (Meta-analysis)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

5 support 1 contradict 0 tested null 3 mixed · 9 sources, 6 independent groups

What the evidence shows

Cohort meta-analyses fairly consistently associate high artificially-sweetened-beverage intake with cardiovascular events and stroke — but the evidence is observational, heterogeneous, and confounded: a Women's-Health-Initiative network meta-analysis found *no consistent pattern*, umbrella reviews call it inconclusive, and bias-adjusted analyses flip toward benefit. A real association worth watchi

The evidence (9)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Beigrezaei et al.
2025 · Nutr Rev
meta-analysis mixed moderate Umbrella review of meta-analyses: evidence on non-sugar-sweetened beverages and chronic-disease/mortality risk inconclusive.
Debras et al.
2022 · BMJ
observational supports moderate NutriNet-Santé: artificial sweeteners (esp. aspartame, sucralose) associated with higher cardiovascular disease risk (coronary + cerebrovascular).
Meng
2021 · Nutrients
meta-analysis supports moderate Dose-response MA: ASB associated with higher CVD and all-cause mortality per serving/day.
Qin et al.
2020 · Eur J Epidemiol
meta-analysis supports moderate Dose-response MA: ASB associated with higher all-cause mortality.
Yang
2022 · Nutrients
meta-analysis mixed moderate WHI cohort + network MA: large between-study heterogeneity, no consistent pattern implicating ASB (or SSB/added sugar) in CVD outcomes.
Ayoub-Charette et al.
2025 · Appl Physiol Nutr Metab
meta-analysis contradicts high Bias-adjusted cohort analyses: NNS associated with LOWER coronary heart disease and cardiovascular/all-cause mortality.
Bhandari et al.
2024 · Curr Dev Nutr
meta-analysis mixed moderate 6-beverage long-term MA: associations for ASB and cardiovascular mortality inconsistent across sexes/studies.
Queiroz et al.
2025 · Curr Probl Cardiol
meta-analysis supports moderate MA: high ASB consumption associated with increased long-term cardiovascular events.
Narain et al.
2016 · Int J Clin Pract
meta-analysis supports moderate MA: sweetened soft drinks (incl. artificially sweetened) associated with higher CVD events/mortality.

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

📚 Suggest a study ⚑ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account — we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.