← All claims

Supplements · Metabolic & Cardiometabolic

coenzyme Q10 decreases blood pressure

In plain terms: Does CoQ10 lower blood pressure?

Contested Supplements 🔬 Includes disconfirming

Part of: 🧪 coenzyme Q10

RefutedContestedStrong support
consensus score 0.17

Contested—older small trials say yes but a Cochrane review and newer trials found no reliable effect, so it's not a dependable blood-pressure treatment.

Evidence ladder

How far up the ladder this claim has climbed. A high consensus on a low rung means "consistent so far," not "proven in people."

Top evidence so far: All trials, pooled (Meta-analysis)

MechanismIn-vitroAnimalObservationalRCTMeta-analysis

How the studies fall

4 support 3 contradict 0 tested null 3 mixed · 10 sources, 7 independent groups

What the evidence shows

Genuinely **contested**. Older/smaller trials and a GRADE dose-response MA (26 RCTs, n=1831; SBP −4.77 mmHg in cardiometabolic disease, U-shaped optimum ~100–200 mg/day) point to a modest reduction — but the disconfirming evidence is substantial: a Cochrane review judged the trials unreliable/insufficient, a controlled-hypertension RCT with 24-h ambulatory BP found no effect, and healthy normotens

The evidence (10)

SourceGradeStanceQualityFinding
Zhao et al.
2022 · Adv Nutr
meta-analysis supports moderate GRADE dose-response MA (26 RCTs, n=1831): SBP -4.77 mmHg in cardiometabolic disease; U-shaped, 100-200 mg/d optimal; GRADE moderate (SBP), lower for DBP.
Burke et al.
2001 · South Med J
RCT supports moderate Double-blind RCT (isolated systolic hypertension, n=83): oral CoQ10 lowered systolic BP vs placebo.
Mori et al.
2009
RCT mixed low RCT in CKD: CoQ10 had only modest BP/heart-rate effects (omega-3 drove the clearer BP reduction).
Karimi et al.
2025 · Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev
meta-analysis mixed moderate SR/MA of CoQ10 on BP and heart rate in adults: prior results inconsistent; effect on BP/HR not consistently significant across populations.
Li et al.
2025 · Clin Ther
meta-analysis mixed moderate SR/MA in T2D: CoQ10 effects on lipid profile and BP suggested but not uniformly significant.
Rosenfeldt et al.
2003 · Biofactors
meta-analysis supports moderate SR of 8 hypertension trials: mean SBP -16 / DBP -10 mmHg with CoQ10 (older, small trials).
Young et al.
2012 · Am J Hypertens
RCT contradicts moderate Crossover RCT (metabolic syndrome, 24-h ambulatory BP): CoQ10 did NOT significantly reduce blood pressure.
Shah et al.
2007 · Ann Pharmacother
RCT contradicts low RCT in healthy individuals: no significant hemodynamic/BP effect of CoQ10 (and no QTc prolongation).
Ho et al.
2016 · Cochrane Database Syst Rev
meta-analysis contradicts moderate Cochrane review (primary hypertension): trials unreliable/insufficient — uncertain that CoQ10 lowers BP; no clinically significant effect established.
Singh et al.
1999 · J Hum Hypertens
RCT supports moderate Double-blind RCT (hypertension + CAD): CoQ10 60 mg bid lowered SBP/DBP and improved insulin/glucose vs B-vitamin control.

Disagree, or know a study we missed?

We grade by evidence, not opinions. The way to weigh in is to point us to a study we haven't cited (check the evidence table above first), or to flag a problem with one we have. Every submission is reviewed; if it holds up, the grade updates and shows in Science Changes Its Mind.

📚 Suggest a study ⚑ Flag / request reclassification

Opens a short form. You'll sign in with Google so submissions are tied to a real account — we don't display your identity, and we only accept a link we can verify (PubMed, DOI, ClinicalTrials.gov).

Educational only, not medical advice. Grades and scores reflect published evidence weighted by study design and quality; see the methodology.